|
 Eighteen
months before her death, Nina had what was described as an 'early morning fit'.
She didn’t seem to be breathing and was rigid but recovered quickly. She was
taken to Student Health where she was sent to A&E. She was kept in overnight
for observation and had a 12 lead ECG which was reported as normal.
She was referred to
Neurology and had an EEG with 1 lead ECG which was reported as normal. I went
with her to the Neurology appointment where the event was described as an
“unexplained episode of unconsciousness” and she was advised not to drive for
one year..…There was no follow up.
On the morning of July 23rd 2003
I found Nina dead.
Post mortem found nothing
abnormal and following discussion with our local pathologist who said it was
almost certainly due to an epileptic seizure, he agreed to send her heart and
brain to specialist pathology centres.
Within days of Nina’s death I had
a phone call from a friend in Scotland who is a cardiologist. He explained to me
that even if the heart pathology came back normal that it could be an electrical
problem and that as these conditions could be inherited I should therefore get
the whole family evaluated.
The younger boys had 12 lead
ECGs and a 24 hour tape which looked normal. Cardiac pathology reported no
abnormal findings on Nina’s heart. Neuro-pathology took 6 months and again
there were no abnormalities found.
Our eldest son lives in New
York. As we had lived in the States for several years it was quite easy to get
him an appointment with a cardiologist. The ECG appeared normal but to be sure
the cardiologist ran it past a friend who specialized in heart rhythms. He
wanted to see Nina’s ECG for comparison so we asked for a copy of the ECG taken
when she had had the original fit to be faxed to him. Within 15 minutes my son
had a phone call telling him that his ECG appeared normal but that Nina’s was
abnormal and looked like Long QT3.
Nina had had a 12 lead ECG; an
EEG with 1 lead ECG; and seen a GP, 2 consultants and 2 specialist registrars.
Back in Britain, at our own
insistence, we took the whole family's ECGs to a cardiac electrophysiologist at
a specialist centre. He agreed that all our ECGs looked normal but that Nina’s
showed Long QT3. The question of genetic inheritance was raised and again we
instigated action. At the post mortem, in spite of guidelines from the College
of Pathologists, there were inadequate and incorrect tissue samples taken, which
has caused some difficulty. However, eventually, with the small amount of
tissue he had, the clinical geneticist was able to rule out the known genetic
“spelling mistakes“ that can cause Long QT. This left us with the possibility
that it was a new mutation and as this is like trying to search for a needle in
a haystack the rest of the family could not be tested.
The death of any child is a
tragedy, but for any family experiencing young sudden cardiac death this tragedy
is compounded by the outreaching genetic implications..
There was no offer from the
medical community for family or bereavement help It would have been helpful to
have been given information about charities such as CRY
Following the inquest into Nina’s
death there was a large article in
The Times.
One success story I would like to tell you about came as a direct result of this
article. A GP in London saw a 23 year old girl who had previously been seen at
his practice with episodes of syncope. Both his partners had sent her away with
the explanation that her blood pressure was low and that she was pre menstrual.
As the GP had read Nina’s story in The Times he referred her to Cardiology where
an ECG showed she had Long QT1. She is now on beta blockers and her whole
family are being assessed. It is possible she would have become one of the 600
young sudden cardiac deaths in Britain each year. This is probably a
conservative estimate - 600 wasted young lives, 12 deaths every week, many of
which are preventable.
From everything I have learned
since Nina’s death it is clear to me that many GPs are not aware of Chapter 8 of
the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease, published in 2005.
This contains recommendations with regard to arrhythmias and sudden cardiac
death. The Department of Health is working to implement this Chapter but it is
complex, involving awareness-raising with GPs and correct referrals both to
secondary care and between hospital departments. If there is a tragedy,
pathologists and coroners need to understand the value of correct tissue samples
and fast track referrals to specialist cardiac pathology, and from there
possibly to genetic evaluation.
Since Nina’s death I have been
busy raising awareness about young sudden cardiac death with GPs, cardiac
networks and most recently medical students - trying to make some impact on the
embryonic doctors of the future. CRY have been a huge source of support to us
from inquest help through to standing behind me as I try to raise awareness.
Simply put, fits, faints and
funny turns need referral to Cardiology. An ECG is an inexpensive, non-invasive
procedure but it must be read by an expert. If Nina had had the correct
referral she could have been fitted with an ICD and maybe last week we would
have been the proud parents attending her graduation in Part II Architecture.
If you would like to contact one of our
Representatives or a Bereavement Supporter please call the CRY office at 01737 363222 or e-mail cry@c-r-y.org.uk
and we will put you in touch with someone who may be able to help
you.
|
